Romney V.S. Obama: Who will win the vote of the militiamen?
It is evident that both Governor Romney and President Obama are
extremely interested in spending additional money on the country’s military.
During one point in Monday night’s debate, the two candidates were actually competing
about who could spend more. As far as military involvement goes, expect more
cuts to be made if President Obama is re-elected. He has always been heavily
persistent in pulling troops out of the War in Iraq from the start of his
presidency, and has been moving troops to the Afghanistan and Iranian border. Obama has always publicly
opposed wars and intervention but has recently admitted to expanding Afghan
conflict into Pakistan. In coincide to that, Governor Romney is working
diligently on being granted the chance to take his own initiative on military
involvement. He agrees to consult with lawyers on legality when dealing with
intervention but believes the President has the right to do whatever it is that
will make the country safer. The
governor had said before that keeping the U.S. in Iraq is the best option for
minimizing casualties and maintaining a democratic government in Iraq.
With
that being said, I would like to conduct interviews with members of Ohio
University’s R.O.T.C. program and perhaps, maybe even current members of the
military residing in the city of Athens. It will be interesting to see the
perspectives of these young adults on the presidential election, and how the
newly elected commander in chief will deal with foreign policies within the next
four years.
I think this is a fantastic idea. However, by the time we present our work the election will be over. Would you have enough time to gather your findings after the election to make it timely?
ReplyDelete